PENGARUH SANCTIFICATION TERHADAP KEPUASAN PERNIKAHAN: PERAN MEDIASI OLEH POSITIVE DYADIC COPING

Lidwina Florentiana Sindoro, Yudiana Ratna Sari

Abstract


The research about protective factors in marital satisfaction guides the researchers to observe spouse spirituality factors in marriage. The research aims to understand the mediation positive dyadic coping effect that bridges positive sanctification of marriage effect and marital satisfaction. Mediation analysis with SPSS macro PROCESS results direct effect sanctification of marriage on marital satisfaction (F(1, 122) = 11.091, p < 0.05)). Sanctification of marriage has proven positive and significant to predict marital satisfaction as a dependent variable (c = 1.307, p < 0.000). The more the person understands marriage as the revelation of God, the marital satisfaction increases. Indirect effect demonstrates a significant result (a*b = 0.76, 95% CI [0.18, 1.41]) with effect size as 0.168. Therefore, positive dyadic coping is a significant mediator between sanctification of marriage and marital satisfaction. The more the person has a notion that marriage is God’s revelation, that person uses the positive dyadic coping more often, the marital satisfaction of that person increases


Keywords


sanctification of mariagge, dyadic coping, marital satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings strengthening couples in the transition to parenthood and long-term effects on partners and children View project Dyadic Management of Diabetes mellitus Type II (DyMand) View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281757984

Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485

Dollahite, D. (2012). “Something More”: The Meanings of Marriage for Religious Couples in America.

Fowers, B. (1993). Enrich Marital Inventory: A Discriminant Validity and Cross-Validation Assessment Related papers.

Goodman, M. A. (2004). HOW RELIGIOUS COUPLES PERCEIVE THE INFLUENCE OF GOD IN THEIR MARRIAGE.

Hafiz, S. el. (2020). A literature review on religiosity in psychological research in Indonesia: current state and future direction. Psikis : Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 6(1).

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, Marital Interaction, and the Trajectory of Marital Satisfaction. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 72, Issue 5).

Krumrei, E. J., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2009). Divorce and the divine: The role of spirituality in adjustment to divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00605.x

Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x

Mahoney, A. (2005). A Higher Purpose: The Sanctification of Strivings Longitudinal study of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, depression, and minority stressors among Latter-day Saint sexual minorities View project LGBTQ Latter-day Saint Mental Health & Well-being View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237789247

Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families, 1999-2009: A relational spirituality framework. In Journal of Marriage and Family (Vol. 72, Issue 4, pp. 805–827). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x

Mahoney, A., & Cano, A. (2014). Introduction to the special section on religion and spirituality in family life: pathways between relational spirituality, family relationships and personal well-being. In Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) (Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 735–738). https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000041

Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Murray-Swank, A., & Murray-Swank, N. (2003). Religion and the sanctification of family relationships. Review of Religious Research, 44(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512384

Nelson, J. M. (2009). Psychology, religion, and spirituality. In Psychology, religion, and spirituality. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87573-6

Padgett, E., Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., & DeMaris, A. (2019a). Marital sanctification and spiritual intimacy predicting married couples’ observed intimacy skills across the transition to Parenthood. Religions, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030177

Rusu, P. P., Hilpert, P., Beach, S. R. H., Turliuc, M. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(6), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000108

Sabey, A. K., Rauer, A. J., & Jensen, J. F. (2014). Compassionate love as a mechanism linking sacred qualities of marriage to older couples’ marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(5), 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036991

Stafford, L., David, P., & McPherson, S. (2014a). Sanctity of marriage and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513486975

Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily Ever After? Religion, Marital Status, Gender, and Relationship Quality in Urban Families.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/jpsi.v20i01.201

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Psikologi : Media Ilmiah Psikologi
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul
Jalan Arjuna Utara No 9 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta 11510 Indonesia

Telp : 021-5674223 ext 266